Evaluation of Constitutive Models for Springback Prediction in U‐draw∕bending of DP and TRIP Steel Sheets

Abstract

U-draw/bending experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the characteristics of springback in sheet metals. The finite element method is frequently used for the simulation of springback, but the predictions are strongly influenced by the constitutive models such as yield criteria and hardening laws. In the present study, springback of DP and TRIP steel sheets after U-draw/bending was predicted with a finite element analysis. Various yield functions were considered, namely, the isotropic von Mises and anisotropic Hill models. For strain hardening, isotropic, non-linear kinematic and combined isotropic-kinematic hardening models were considered. In order to characterize the isotropic hardening behavior, both uniaxial and balanced biaxial (hydraulic bulge) tension tests were carried out. For the characterization of the combined isotropic-kinematic hardening model, forward-reverse simple shear tests were conducted. The springback predictions were greatly influenced by the choice of the hardening model but slightly affected by the choice of the yield criterion. The kinematic hardening and combined isotropic-kinematic hardening models provided satisfactory predictions for DP590 and TRIP590 sheets, respectively. Due to an extended measurable strain range, the use of the flow curves from the hydraulic bulge test led to more reliable results than those of uniaxial tension.