Open Access System for Information Sharing
All
Title
Author
Subject
Login
Library
Help
검색
HOME
Communities & Collections
Researchers
Title
Browse by Researchers
HAN, KYUNG SEOP (한경섭)
Dept of Mechanical Engineering(기계공학과)
Field(s)
E-Mail
Homepage
Loading...
Export
Journal Papers
(International)
Journal Papers
(Domestic)
Conference Papers
(International)
Conference Papers
(Domestic)
Journal Papers(International)
Journal Papers(Domestic)
Conference Papers(International)
Conference Papers(Domestic)
30 items
100 items
200 items
Show more items...
H-INDEX
Chart.
Keyword
INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||necking:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||metalmatrix composites:1||absorbed energy:1||tensile loading:1||damage tolerance:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||crack propagation:1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||GRAPHITE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||DIE:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||FE modal analysis:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||ANGLE:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||WINDING ANGLE:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||metal matrix composites:3||microstructure:3||optimum design:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||PLATES:3||genetic algorithm:3||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ALUMINUM:2||FRICTION:2||OPTIMUM DESIGN:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||elastic modulus:2||fractographic study:2||tensile coupon:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||PURE METAL:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||characteristic length:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||FIBROUS PREFORMS:2||cureinplace:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||wall ironing:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||strength recovery:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||fractography:2||ACTUATORS:2||fatigue crack growth:2||BRIDGE:2||creepfatigue interaction:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||DESIGN:1||LAYER THICKNESS:1||CRITERION:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||Wear resistance:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||damage monitoring:1||fracture:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||solid lubrication film:1||expanded graphite:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||natural frequency:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||SILIC
