Open Access System for Information Sharing
All
Title
Author
Subject
Login
Library
Help
검색
HOME
Communities & Collections
Researchers
Title
Browse by Researchers
HAN, KYUNG SEOP (한경섭)
Dept of Mechanical Engineering(기계공학과)
Field(s)
E-Mail
Homepage
Loading...
Export
Journal Papers
(International)
Journal Papers
(Domestic)
Conference Papers
(International)
Conference Papers
(Domestic)
Journal Papers(International)
Journal Papers(Domestic)
Conference Papers(International)
Conference Papers(Domestic)
30 items
100 items
200 items
Show more items...
H-INDEX
Chart.
Keyword
INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR:1||MICROPUMP:1||LIFE PREDICTION:1||INFILTRATION:7||WINDING ANGLE:6||COMPOSITE:6||acoustic emission:6||STEEL:4||STRAIN:4||strength:4||STRESS:4||failure index:4||ELEMENT:4||DEFORMATION:4||BEHAVIOR:3||OPTIMIZATION:3||PURE METAL:3||microstructure:3||FIBROUS PREFORMS:3||optimum design:3||genetic algorithm:3||COST:3||GROWTH:3||squeeze casting method:3||MECHANICALPROPERTIES:3||PLATES:3||ALUMINUM:3||OPTIMUM DESIGN:3||metal matrix composites:3||creepfatigue interaction:2||FRACTURETOUGHNESS:2||finite element analysis:2||abrasive wear:2||carbonfiberreinforced plastics (CFRP):2||biaxial strength:2||mechanical properties:2||ANGLE:2||FRICTION:2||fatigue life prediction:2||STRENGTH:2||COMBINED EXTERNALPRESSURE:2||carbon/epoxy:2||PARTICLESIZE:2||ALLOY:2||MICROSTRUCTURE:2||elastic modulus:2||tensile coupon:2||hybrid metal matrix composites:2||fractographic study:2||scanning electron microscopy (SEM):2||failure criterion:2||artificial neural networks (ANN):2||TORSION:2||PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS:2||powder metallurgy:2||LAMINATE:2||LAYER THICKNESS:2||CRITERION:2||SOLIDIFICATION:2||graphite/epoxy:2||fibermetal laminate:2||I can:2||fatigue modulus:2||fiber reinforced plastics (FRP):2||characteristic length:2||bearing strength:2||pin loading:2||FIBERS:2||PREDICTION:2||DAMAGE:2||fibermetal laminates:2||flexural strength:2||fracture toughness:2||METALMATRIX COMPOSITES:2||cureinplace:2||SLIDING WEAR:2||failure mechanism:2||PRESSURE:2||stress/strain curves:2||SENSORS:2||FABRICATION:2||MATRIX COMPOSITES:2||strength recovery:2||fatigue damage:2||repair:2||wall ironing:2||failure mode:2||CONTROLLABILITY:2||DAMAGE MECHANICS:2||MODEL:2||SYSTEM:2||CARBON:2||POWDERS:2||WEAR BEHAVIOR:2||CRACKGROWTH:2||crack growth:2||stress intensity factor:2||fatigue life:2||fatigue strength reduction factor:2||ABRASIVE WEAR:2||GENETIC ALGORITHM:2||fatigue crack growth:2||fractography:2||GRAPHITE:2||ACTUATORS:2||BRIDGE:2||Fracture mechanics:1||Wind turbine blades:1||thickness ratio:1||wear mechanism:1||heat transfer:1||STIFFNESS:1||tinplate:1||carbon fiber:1||solid lubricant wear:1||mechanically fastened joints:1||s nonquadratic:1||CYCLE:1||Sheet metal forming:1||REINFORCED ALUMINUMALLOYS:1||SILICONCARBIDE:1||high filler loadings:1||particle size:1||FIBER:1||Hybrid ratio:1||AL2O3:1||fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor:1||DESIGN:1||optical fiber vibration sensor:1||Adhesive joints:1||Metal matrix composites:1||shortfiber composites:1||life prediction:1||complex terrain:1||squeeze infiltration method:1||AL:1||pressure metal infiltration:1||AL2O3/AL COMPOSITES:1||IMAGEANALYSIS:1||enthalpy method:1||FRACTURE:1||friction coefficient:1||Hill&apos:1||stress analysis:1||Acceptable forming zone:1||CRACK GROWTH:1||Forming limit diagram:1||THERMALCONDUCTIVITY:1||BLENDS:1||Wear resistance:1||SILICON:1||LAYER:1||Conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||damage monitoring:1||finite element method:1||adaptive meshing:1||fracture:1||image processing:1||die entrance angle:1||ALUMINUMALLOY COMPOSITES:1||solid lubrication film:1||proton exchange membrane fuel cells:1||expanded graphite:1||ALUMINUM COMPOSITE:1||CARBON NANOTUBES:1||natural frequency:1||Realtime monitoring:1||composite wind turbine blade:1||impact location detection:1||smart structure:1||Fracture toughness:1||COMPOSITES:1||single overload:1||quasiisotropic composite laminates:1||damage initiation:1||indentation:1||rezoning technique:1||particle:1||stress concentration:1||yield function:1||metal matrix composites (MMCs):1||PARTICLESIZE DEPENDENCE:1||SICPARTICULATE:1||WHISKERS:1||composite bipolar plates:1||conductive polymer composites (CPCs):1||Dry sliding wear:1||ALUMINUMALLOY:1||expanded graphite (EG):1||electrical conductivity:1||OPTIMALDESIGN:1||carbon/epoxy laminates:1||multiaxial loading:1||fatigue:1||optical fiber sensor:1||necking:1||SILICONNITRIDE CERAMICS:1||tensile loading:1||coefficient of friction:1||steel D &:1||residual stress:1||punch load history:1||hybrid composite:1||hybrid metal matrix composite:1||absorbed energy:1||metalmatrix composites:1||damage tolerance:1||crack propagation:1||PERCOLATION BEHAVIOR:1||metal matrix composites (MMCS):1||Metal matrix composite:1||PARTICLES:1||COMPOSITE PLATES:1||SIZE:1||LEVEL FATIGUE:1||CYCLE FATIGUE:1||composite rotor blades:1||ceramicmetal composites:1||variable amplitude loading:1||wear properties:1||lubrication:1||REINFORCED AA6061 COMPOSITES:1||numerical modeling:1||fiber metal laminate:1||POLYMERS:1||dynamic fracture toughness:1||impact velocity:1||DIE:1||preform:1||FIBER ORIENTATION:1||CARBON NANOTUBE COMPOSITES:1||ELECTRICALPROPERTIES:1||THRESHOLDS:1||Fiber orientation:1||Lubricant sliding wear:1||wind turbine:1||notch fracture toughness:1||VOLUME FRACTION:1||easy open end:1||shear failure:1||fiber orientation distribution:1||COMPOSITEMATERIALS:1||AIRCRAFT:1||THERMOPLASTICS:1||temperature rise:1||fiber:1||limit ironing reduction:1||steel D&:1||interrelationship:1||creepfatigue:1||wear resistance:1||CONDUCTIVITY:1||physical properties:1||particle shape:1||RESISTIVITY:1||graphite nanofibers (GNFs):1||thermal properties:1||MMCS:1||SYSTEMS:1||FE modal analysis:1||cumulative damage:1||Finite element analysis:1||Cohesive zone model:1||TESTS:1||gust model:1||fatigue safety:1||BRAGG GRATING SENSORS:1||ALLOYS:1||shortfiberreinforced composites:1||strain energy release rate (SERR):1||TEMPERATURE:1||DRY:1||fiber orientation:1||cluster structure:1||strengthening mechanisms:1||SUS304:1||high temperature:1||Numerical simulation:1||graphite nanofiber:1||PROPAGATION:1||TRIBOLOGICAL B
