Open Access System for Information Sharing

Login Library

 

Article
Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads
Full metadata record
Files in This Item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMINSUNG, KIMko
dc.contributor.authorJUNG, INHYEko
dc.contributor.authorAlleman, DOuglasko
dc.contributor.authorLEE, EUL BUMko
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-28T06:34:47Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-28T06:34:47Z-
dc.date.created2018-12-14-
dc.date.issued2018-12-
dc.identifier.citationSUSTAINABILITY, v.10, no.12-
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.urihttp://oasis.postech.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/94580-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-fuzzy inference system (FIS) model to aid decision-makers in the risk assessment and mitigation of overseas steel-plant projects. Through a thorough literature review, the authors identified 57 risks associated with international steel construction, operation, and transference of new technologies. Pairwise comparisons of all 57 risks by 14 subject-matter experts resulted in a relative weighting. Furthermore, to mitigate human subjectivity, vagueness, and uncertainty, a fuzzy analysis based on the findings of two case studies was performed. From these combined analyses, weighted individual risk soring resulted in the following top five most impactful international steel project risks: procurement of raw materials; design errors and omissions; conditions of raw materials; technology spill prevention plan; investment cost and poor plant availability and performance. Risk mitigation measures are also presented, and risk scores are re-assessed through the AHP-FIS analysis model depicting an overall project risk score reduction. The model presented is a useful tool for industry performing steel project risk assessments. It also provides decision-makers with a better understanding of the criticality of risks that are likely to occur on international steel projects.-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-fuzzy inference system (FIS) model to aid decision-makers in the risk assessment and mitigation of overseas steel-plant projects. Through a thorough literature review, the authors identified 57 risks associated with international steel construction, operation, and transference of new technologies. Pairwise comparisons of all 57 risks by 14 subject-matter experts resulted in a relative weighting. Furthermore, to mitigate human subjectivity, vagueness, and uncertainty, a fuzzy analysis based on the findings of two case studies was performed. From these combined analyses, weighted individual risk soring resulted in the following top five most impactful international steel project risks: procurement of raw materials; design errors and omissions; conditions of raw materials; technology spill prevention plan; investment cost and poor plant availability and performance. Risk mitigation measures are also presented, and risk scores are re-assessed through the AHP-FIS analysis model depicting an overall project risk score reduction. The model presented is a useful tool for industry performing steel project risk assessments. It also provides decision-makers with a better understanding of the criticality of risks that are likely to occur on international steel projects.-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-fuzzy inference system (FIS) model to aid decision-makers in the risk assessment and mitigation of overseas steel-plant projects. Through a thorough literature review, the authors identified 57 risks associated with international steel construction, operation, and transference of new technologies. Pairwise comparisons of all 57 risks by 14 subject-matter experts resulted in a relative weighting. Furthermore, to mitigate human subjectivity, vagueness, and uncertainty, a fuzzy analysis based on the findings of two case studies was performed. From these combined analyses, weighted individual risk soring resulted in the following top five most impactful international steel project risks: procurement of raw materials; design errors and omissions; conditions of raw materials; technology spill prevention plan; investment cost and poor plant availability and performance. Risk mitigation measures are also presented, and risk scores are re-assessed through the AHP-FIS analysis model depicting an overall project risk score reduction. The model presented is a useful tool for industry performing steel project risk assessments. It also provides decision-makers with a better understanding of the criticality of risks that are likely to occur on international steel projects.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.titleRisk Assessment and Mitigation Model for Overseas Steel-Plant Project Investment with Analytic Hierarchy ProcessFuzzy Inference System-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su10124780-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.contributor.localauthorLEE, EUL BUM-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorAlleman, DOuglas-
dc.identifier.wosid000455338100446-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.titleSUSTAINABILITY-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85058573227-
dc.description.journalClass1-

qr_code

  • mendeley

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher

 LEE, EUL BUM
Graduate Institute of Ferrous Technology
Read more

Views & Downloads

Browse